Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
LS XU65 vs Massey Ferguson 2606H
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 2606H
Utility
- power
- 65 hp
- displacement
- 158 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
LSLS XU65
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 2606H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedXU6565 hp
2606H65 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
XU65 is in the 59th percentile; 2606H is in the 59th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2606H higher · +23 ci (+17%)XU65135 ci
2606H158 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
XU65 is in the 33rd percentile; 2606H is in the 42nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ XU65 higher · +1 (+33%)XU654
2606H3
Median Utility Tractor4
XU65 is in the 50th percentile; 2606H is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ XU65 higher · +8 (+100%)XU6516
2606H8
Median Utility Tractor12
XU65 is in the 73rd percentile; 2606H is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
XU65 (A)2606H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS XU65 | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | XU65 | 2606H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS XU65 | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Simpson | — |
| Model | N4LDI-TA-48 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 65hp | 65hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ XU65+600 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ XU65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 135ci | 158ci | ▲ 2606H+23 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.7in | ▲ 2606H+0.4 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 5in | ▲ 2606H+1.1 in · +28% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS XU65 | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Sync shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS XU65 | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 142in | 138in | ▲ XU65+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 66.9in | 69.9in | ▲ 2606H+3 in · +4% |
| Height | 103in | 93.9in | ▲ XU65+9.1 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 4,674lb | 5,115lb | ▲ 2606H+441 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS XU65 | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | LS XU65 | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS XU65 | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,756lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS XU65 | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | LS XU65 | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS XU65 | Massey Ferguson 2606H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Two-post folding ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 59th percentile (65 hp)B · 59th percentile (65 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 33rd percentile (135 ci)B · 42nd percentile (158 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 45th percentile (4,674 lb)B · 49th percentile (5,115 lb)
A · XU65B · 2606HMedian Utility Tractor