Image not recorded
MahindraModel A
Mahindra 6065
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 162 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 15
Head to head · Utility
Mahindra 6065 vs Yanmar FX32D
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FX32D
Utility
- power
- 32 hp
- displacement
- 100 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
MahindraMahindra 6065
vs
YanmarYanmar FX32D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 6065 higher · +30 hp (+94%)606562 hp
FX32D32 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
6065 is in the 56th percentile; FX32D is in the 24th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6065 higher · +62 ci (+62%)6065162 ci
FX32D100 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
6065 is in the 43rd percentile; FX32D is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FX32D higher · +1 (+33%)60653
FX32D4
Median Utility Tractor4
6065 is in the 23rd percentile; FX32D is in the 50th · 5,720 models
6065 (A)FX32D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Mahindra 6065 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mahindra | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 6065 | FX32D | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Mahindra 6065 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mahindra | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4TNA78 | — |
| Power Output | 62hp | 32hp | ▲ 6065+30 hp · +94% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ FX32D+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 162ci | 100ci | ▲ 6065+62 ci · +62% |
| Bore | 3.8in | 3.1in | ▲ 6065+0.7 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 3.4in | ▲ 6065+1.4 in · +41% |
Transmission
| Spec | Mahindra 6065 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Mahindra 6065 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 73.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 104in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,096lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Mahindra 6065 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Mahindra 6065 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Mahindra 6065 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Mahindra 6065 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Mahindra 6065 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 56th percentile (62 hp)B · 24th percentile (32 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 43rd percentile (162 ci)B · 23rd percentile (100 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · 6065B · FX32DMedian Utility Tractor