MarshallModel A
Marshall 264
Utility
- power
- 25.8 hp
- displacement
- 68.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Marshall 264 vs New Holland Boomer 1025
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland Boomer 1025
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 69 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
MarshallMarshall 264
vs
New HollandNew Holland Boomer 1025
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Boomer 1025 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)26425.8 hp
Boomer 102526 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
264 is in the 17th percentile; Boomer 1025 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Boomer 1025 higher · +0.6 ci (<1%)26468.4 ci
Boomer 102569 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
264 is in the 8th percentile; Boomer 1025 is in the 10th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Boomer 1025 higher · +1 (+50%)2642
Boomer 10253
Median Utility Tractor4
264 is in the 3rd percentile; Boomer 1025 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 264 higher · +90 lb (+6%)2641,545 lb
Boomer 10251,455 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
264 is in the 7th percentile; Boomer 1025 is in the 5th · 5,107 models
264 (A)Boomer 1025 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Marshall 264 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Marshall | New Holland | — |
| Model | 264 | Boomer 1025 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Marshall 264 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Lombardini | Shibaura | — |
| Model | 9LD561-2 | S773L | — |
| Power Output | 25.8hp | 26hp | ▲ Boomer 1025+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,000RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ Boomer 1025+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 68.4ci | 69ci | ▲ Boomer 1025+0.6 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Marshall 264 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Marshall 264 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 86in | 96.6in | ▲ Boomer 1025+10.6 in · +12% |
| Width | 39.4in | 46.4in | ▲ Boomer 1025+7 in · +18% |
| Height | 46.5in | 72.4in | ▲ Boomer 1025+25.9 in · +56% |
| Operating Weight | 1,545lb | 1,455lb | ▲ 264+90 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Marshall 264 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Marshall 264 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00-12 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 8.25-16 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Marshall 264 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Marshall 264 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Marshall 264 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Marshall 264 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 17th percentile (25.8 hp)B · 18th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (68.4 ci)B · 10th percentile (69 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 7th percentile (1,545 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,455 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 4th percentile (86 in)B · 7th percentile (96.6 in)
A · 264B · Boomer 1025Median Utility Tractor