Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel A
Massey Ferguson 1035
Utility
- power
- 31 hp
- displacement
- 91.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Massey Ferguson 1035 vs Massey Ferguson 271XE
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 271XE
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 236 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1035
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 271XE
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 271XE higher · +144 ci (+157%)103591.8 ci
271XE236 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1035 is in the 21st percentile; 271XE is in the 65th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 271XE higher · +1 (+33%)10353
271XE4
Median Utility Tractor4
1035 is in the 23rd percentile; 271XE is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1035 higher · +4 (+50%)103512
271XE8
Median Utility Tractor12
1035 is in the 50th percentile; 271XE is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 271XE higher · +2,889 lb (+107%)10352,711 lb
271XE5,600 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1035 is in the 19th percentile; 271XE is in the 52nd · 5,107 models
1035 (A)271XE (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1035 | Massey Ferguson 271XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey Ferguson | Massey Ferguson | Same |
| Model | 1035 | 271XE | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1035 | Massey Ferguson 271XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Perkins | — |
| Model | MS150 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 31hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 271XE+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 91.8ci | 236ci | ▲ 271XE+144 ci · +157% |
| Bore | 3.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1035 | Massey Ferguson 271XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type with dry disc clutch | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1035 | Massey Ferguson 271XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 59.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 60.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,711lb | 5,600lb | ▲ 271XE+2,889 lb · +107% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1035 | Massey Ferguson 271XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1035 | Massey Ferguson 271XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1035 | Massey Ferguson 271XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1035 | Massey Ferguson 271XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1035 | Massey Ferguson 271XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1035 | Massey Ferguson 271XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1035 | Massey Ferguson 271XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (91.8 ci)B · 65th percentile (236 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 19th percentile (2,711 lb)B · 52nd percentile (5,600 lb)
A · 1035B · 271XEMedian Utility Tractor