Massey FergusonModel A
Massey Ferguson 1040
Utility
- power
- 32 hp
- displacement
- 122 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Massey Ferguson 1040 vs Massey Ferguson 298
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 298
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 318 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1040
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 298
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 298 higher · +196 ci (+161%)1040122 ci
298318 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1040 is in the 29th percentile; 298 is in the 85th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 298 higher · +1 (+33%)10403
2984
Median Utility Tractor4
1040 is in the 23rd percentile; 298 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied104012
29812
Median Utility Tractor12
1040 is in the 50th percentile; 298 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 298 higher · +4,620 lb (+138%)10403,350 lb
2987,970 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1040 is in the 27th percentile; 298 is in the 75th · 5,107 models
1040 (A)298 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1040 | Massey Ferguson 298 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey Ferguson | Massey Ferguson | Same |
| Model | 1040 | 298 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1040 | Massey Ferguson 298 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Perkins | — |
| Model | 3D200 | AD4.318 | — |
| Power Output | 32hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 1040+500 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 298+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 122ci | 318ci | ▲ 298+196 ci · +161% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 4.5in | ▲ 298+0.9 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 5in | ▲ 298+1.1 in · +28% |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1040 | Massey Ferguson 298 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1040 | Massey Ferguson 298 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 115in | 161in | ▲ 298+46 in · +40% |
| Width | 58.5in | 79in | ▲ 298+20.5 in · +35% |
| Height | 60.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,350lb | 7,970lb | ▲ 298+4,620 lb · +138% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1040 | Massey Ferguson 298 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1040 | Massey Ferguson 298 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Standard | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1040 | Massey Ferguson 298 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1040 | Massey Ferguson 298 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1040 | Massey Ferguson 298 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1040 | Massey Ferguson 298 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1040 | Massey Ferguson 298 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 29th percentile (122 ci)B · 85th percentile (318 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 27th percentile (3,350 lb)B · 75th percentile (7,970 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 20th percentile (115 in)B · 78th percentile (161 in)
A · 1040B · 298Median Utility Tractor