Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel A
Massey Ferguson 148
Utility
- power
- 49 hp
- displacement
- 152 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Massey Ferguson 148 vs McCormick Intl X10.50H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.50H
Utility
- power
- 49 hp
- displacement
- 149 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 148
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.50H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied14849 hp
X10.50H49 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
148 is in the 44th percentile; X10.50H is in the 44th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 148 higher · +3 ci (+2%)148152 ci
X10.50H149 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
148 is in the 39th percentile; X10.50H is in the 38th · 5,580 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.50H higher · +2 lb (<1%)1483,933 lb
X10.50H3,935 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
148 is in the 36th percentile; X10.50H is in the 36th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ X10.50H higher · +5 in (+4%)148129 in
X10.50H134 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
148 is in the 39th percentile; X10.50H is in the 46th · 4,659 models
148 (A)X10.50H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 148 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey Ferguson | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 148 | X10.50H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 148 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Daedong | — |
| Model | AD3.152 | 4B243L | — |
| Power Output | 49hp | 49hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,250RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ X10.50H+350 RPM · +16% |
| Cylinders | 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 152ci | 149ci | ▲ 148+3 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 148 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Multi-Power | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 148 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | 134in | ▲ X10.50H+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 64in | 63.9in | ▲ 148+0.1 in · <1% |
| Height | Not recorded | 96.2in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,933lb | 3,935lb | ▲ X10.50H+2 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 148 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 148 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 148 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 148 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 148 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 148 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 44th percentile (49 hp)B · 44th percentile (49 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 39th percentile (152 ci)B · 38th percentile (149 ci)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 36th percentile (3,933 lb)B · 36th percentile (3,935 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 39th percentile (129 in)B · 46th percentile (134 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 45th percentile (64 in)B · 45th percentile (63.9 in)
A · 148B · X10.50HMedian Utility Tractor