Massey FergusonModel A
Massey Ferguson 1652
Utility
- power
- 52.2 hp
- displacement
- 180 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Massey Ferguson 1652 vs Massey Ferguson 243
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 243
Utility
- power
- 52 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1652
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 243
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1652 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)165252.2 hp
24352 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1652 is in the 48th percentile; 243 is in the 47th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1652 higher · +15 ci (+9%)1652180 ci
243165 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1652 is in the 49th percentile; 243 is in the 44th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1652 higher · +1 (+33%)16524
2433
Median Utility Tractor4
1652 is in the 50th percentile; 243 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 243 higher · +1,350 lb (+36%)16523,780 lb
2435,130 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1652 is in the 33rd percentile; 243 is in the 49th · 5,107 models
1652 (A)243 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1652 | Massey Ferguson 243 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey Ferguson | Massey Ferguson | Same |
| Model | 1652 | 243 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1652 | Massey Ferguson 243 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 903.27 | — |
| Power Output | 52.2hp | 52hp | ▲ 1652+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ 1652+250 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 1652+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 180ci | 165ci | ▲ 1652+15 ci · +9% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.7in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1652 | Massey Ferguson 243 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | PowerShuttle | Sliding gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1652 | Massey Ferguson 243 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 133in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 67.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 103in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,780lb | 5,130lb | ▲ 243+1,350 lb · +36% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1652 | Massey Ferguson 243 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1652 | Massey Ferguson 243 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Live (two-stage clutch) | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1652 | Massey Ferguson 243 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1652 | Massey Ferguson 243 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Independent wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1652 | Massey Ferguson 243 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1652 | Massey Ferguson 243 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | 2.8gal | ▲ 243+0.8 gal · +40% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1652 | Massey Ferguson 243 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post folding ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 48th percentile (52.2 hp)B · 47th percentile (52 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (180 ci)B · 44th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 33rd percentile (3,780 lb)B · 49th percentile (5,130 lb)
A · 1652B · 243Median Utility Tractor