Massey FergusonModel A
Massey Ferguson 1660
Utility
- power
- 60 hp
- displacement
- 180 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Massey Ferguson 1660 vs Steyr 970
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1660
vs
SteyrSteyr 970
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 970 higher · +10 hp (+17%)166060 hp
97070 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1660 is in the 54th percentile; 970 is in the 63rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 970 higher · +10 ci (+6%)1660180 ci
970190 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1660 is in the 49th percentile; 970 is in the 51st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1660 higher · +1 (+33%)16604
9703
Median Utility Tractor4
1660 is in the 50th percentile; 970 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 970 higher · +4 (+33%)166012
97016
Median Utility Tractor12
1660 is in the 50th percentile; 970 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
1660 (A)970 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Steyr 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey Ferguson | Steyr | — |
| Model | 1660 | 970 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Steyr 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Steyr | — |
| Model | Not recorded | WD301.87 | — |
| Power Output | 60hp | 70hp | ▲ 970+10 hp · +17% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 1660+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 1660+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 180ci | 190ci | ▲ 970+10 ci · +6% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Steyr 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | PowerShuttle, DynaQPS | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Steyr 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 135in | 150in | ▲ 970+15 in · +11% |
| Width | 70.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 104in | 94.9in | ▲ 1660+9.1 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 4,079lb | 6,461lb | ▲ 970+2,382 lb · +58% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Steyr 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Steyr 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 750rpm | — |
| Speed 3 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Steyr 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 8,378lb | 5,954lb | ▲ 1660+2,424 lb · +41% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Steyr 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Steyr 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Steyr 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 1660 | Steyr 970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 54th percentile (60 hp)B · 63rd percentile (70 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (180 ci)B · 51st percentile (190 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 38th percentile (4,079 lb)B · 61st percentile (6,461 lb)
A · 1660B · 970Median Utility Tractor