Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel A
Massey Ferguson 492
Utility
- power
- 99 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Massey Ferguson 492 vs McCormick Intl X4.60
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X4.60
Utility
- power
- 99 hp
- displacement
- 219 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 492
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X4.60
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied49299 hp
X4.6099 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
492 is in the 82nd percentile; X4.60 is in the 82nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 492 higher · +50 ci (+23%)492269 ci
X4.60219 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
492 is in the 78th percentile; X4.60 is in the 60th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied4924
X4.604
Median Utility Tractor4
492 is in the 50th percentile; X4.60 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ X4.60 higher · +12 (+100%)49212
X4.6024
Median Utility Tractor12
492 is in the 50th percentile; X4.60 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
492 (A)X4.60 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | McCormick Intl X4.60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey Ferguson | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 492 | X4.60 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | McCormick Intl X4.60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Deutz | — |
| Model | 1104C-44T | C4DT69 | — |
| Power Output | 99hp | 99hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 269ci | 219ci | ▲ 492+50 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.8in | ▲ 492+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ 492+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | McCormick Intl X4.60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | McCormick Intl X4.60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 155in | 170in | ▲ X4.60+15 in · +10% |
| Width | 80in | 69in | ▲ 492+11 in · +16% |
| Height | Not recorded | 102in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 7,040lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | McCormick Intl X4.60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | McCormick Intl X4.60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | McCormick Intl X4.60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,200lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | McCormick Intl X4.60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | McCormick Intl X4.60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | McCormick Intl X4.60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 82nd percentile (99 hp)B · 82nd percentile (99 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 78th percentile (269 ci)B · 60th percentile (219 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Length
median 137 inA · 71st percentile (155 in)B · 86th percentile (170 in)
A · 492B · X4.60Median Utility Tractor