Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel A
Massey Ferguson 88
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 242 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Massey Ferguson 88 vs Massey-Harris 201
Massey-HarrisModel B
Massey-Harris 201
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 242 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 4
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 88
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris 201
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied88242 ci
201242 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
88 is in the 67th percentile; 201 is in the 67th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 201 higher · +2 (+50%)884
2016
Median Utility Tractor4
88 is in the 50th percentile; 201 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 88 higher · +4 (+100%)888
2014
Median Utility Tractor12
88 is in the 23rd percentile; 201 is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 88 higher · +465 lb (+7%)887,165 lb
2016,700 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
88 is in the 68th percentile; 201 is in the 64th · 5,107 models
88 (A)201 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 88 | Massey-Harris 201 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey Ferguson | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | 88 | 201 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility, Standard Tread | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 88 | Massey-Harris 201 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Continental | Chrysler | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ 88+300 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 201+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 242ci | 242ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.4in | ▲ 88+0.5 in · +15% |
| Stroke | 5.1in | 4.5in | ▲ 88+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 88 | Massey-Harris 201 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 88 | Massey-Harris 201 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 7,165lb | 6,700lb | ▲ 88+465 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 88 | Massey-Harris 201 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Tires
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 88 | Massey-Harris 201 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 7.50-18 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 13-28 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 88 | Massey-Harris 201 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 88 | Massey-Harris 201 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 67th percentile (242 ci)B · 67th percentile (242 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 68th percentile (7,165 lb)B · 64th percentile (6,700 lb)
A · 88B · 201Median Utility Tractor