Massey-HarrisModel A
Massey-Harris 202
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Utility
Massey-Harris 202 vs Massey-Harris 25 26-41
Massey-HarrisModel B
Massey-Harris 25 26-41
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 346 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris 202
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris 25 26-41
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 25 26-41 higher · +56 ci (+19%)202290 ci
25 26-41346 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
202 is in the 84th percentile; 25 26-41 is in the 86th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 202 higher · +2 (+50%)2026
25 26-414
Median Utility Tractor4
202 is in the 93rd percentile; 25 26-41 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 202 higher · +1 (+33%)2024
25 26-413
Median Utility Tractor12
202 is in the 4th percentile; 25 26-41 is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 202 higher · +1,700 lb (+34%)2026,700 lb
25 26-415,000 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
202 is in the 64th percentile; 25 26-41 is in the 47th · 5,107 models
202 (A)25 26-41 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris 25 26-41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey-Harris | Massey-Harris | Same |
| Model | 202 | 25 26-41 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility, Standard Tread | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris 25 26-41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Continental | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | M292 | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 202+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 290ci | 346ci | ▲ 25 26-41+56 ci · +19% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.8in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris 25 26-41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris 25 26-41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 135in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 65.5in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 57in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,700lb | 5,000lb | ▲ 202+1,700 lb · +34% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris 25 26-41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris 25 26-41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris 25 26-41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (290 ci)B · 86th percentile (346 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 3rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 64th percentile (6,700 lb)B · 47th percentile (5,000 lb)
A · 202B · 25 26-41Median Utility Tractor