Image not recorded
Massey-HarrisModel A
Massey-Harris 203
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 330 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Utility
Massey-Harris 203 vs McCormick-Deering WD-9
Image not recorded
McCormick-DeeringModel B
McCormick-Deering WD-9
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 335 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris 203
vs
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering WD-9
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ WD-9 higher · +5 ci (+2%)203330 ci
WD-9335 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
203 is in the 85th percentile; WD-9 is in the 86th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 203 higher · +2 (+50%)2036
WD-94
Median Utility Tractor4
203 is in the 93rd percentile; WD-9 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ WD-9 higher · +1 (+25%)2034
WD-95
Median Utility Tractor12
203 is in the 4th percentile; WD-9 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 203 higher · +50 lb (<1%)2036,700 lb
WD-96,650 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
203 is in the 64th percentile; WD-9 is in the 63rd · 5,107 models
203 (A)WD-9 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey-Harris 203 | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey-Harris | McCormick-Deering | — |
| Model | 203 | WD-9 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility, Standard Tread | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey-Harris 203 | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Continental | International Harvester | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ 203+500 RPM · +33% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 203+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 330ci | 335ci | ▲ WD-9+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.4in | ▲ WD-9+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 5.5in | ▲ WD-9+1.1 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey-Harris 203 | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey-Harris 203 | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 134in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 68in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,700lb | 6,650lb | ▲ 203+50 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey-Harris 203 | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey-Harris 203 | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey-Harris 203 | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 85th percentile (330 ci)B · 86th percentile (335 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 64th percentile (6,700 lb)B · 63rd percentile (6,650 lb)
A · 203B · WD-9Median Utility Tractor