Image not recorded
McCormick-DeeringModel A
McCormick-Deering FU235
Sub-Compact
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Sub-Compact
McCormick-Deering FU235 vs McCormick-Deering FU265
Image not recorded
McCormick-DeeringModel B
McCormick-Deering FU265
Utility
- power
- 35 hp
- displacement
- 136 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering FU235
vs
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering FU265
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ FU265 higher · +9 hp (+35%)FU23526 hp
FU26535 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
FU235 is in the 49th percentile; FU265 is in the 66th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FU265 higher · +13 ci (+11%)FU235123 ci
FU265136 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
FU235 is in the 70th percentile; FU265 is in the 75th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFU2354
FU2654
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
FU235 is in the 90th percentile; FU265 is in the 90th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ FU265 higher · +2 (+50%)FU2354
FU2656
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
FU235 is in the 2nd percentile; FU265 is in the 18th · 616 models
FU235 (A)FU265 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick-Deering FU235 | McCormick-Deering FU265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick-Deering | McCormick-Deering | Same |
| Model | FU235 | FU265 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick-Deering FU235 | McCormick-Deering FU265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | International Harvester | Same |
| Model | 2.0L 4-cyl gasoline | FD-136 | — |
| Power Output | 26hp | 35hp | ▲ FU265+9 hp · +35% |
| Rated RPM | 1,650RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ FU265+350 RPM · +21% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 123ci | 136ci | ▲ FU265+13 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.3in | ▲ FU265+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 4in | 4in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick-Deering FU235 | McCormick-Deering FU265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick-Deering FU235 | McCormick-Deering FU265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 105in | 117in | ▲ FU265+12 in · +11% |
| Width | 68.5in | 81.9in | ▲ FU265+13.4 in · +20% |
| Height | 55.9in | 65.4in | ▲ FU265+9.5 in · +17% |
| Operating Weight | 3,483lb | 4,012lb | ▲ FU265+529 lb · +15% |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick-Deering FU235 | McCormick-Deering FU265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | McCormick-Deering FU235 | McCormick-Deering FU265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.3gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 49th percentile (26 hp)B · 66th percentile (35 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 70th percentile (123 ci)B · 75th percentile (136 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 90th percentile (4)B · 90th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 2nd percentile (4)B · 18th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 66th percentile (3,483 lb)B · 80th percentile (4,012 lb)
A · FU235B · FU265Median Sub-Compact Tractor