Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl C90 Max
Utility
- power
- 83 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl C90 Max vs Shibaura SE8300
ShibauraModel B
Shibaura SE8300
Utility
- power
- 83 hp
- displacement
- 278 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl C90 Max
vs
ShibauraShibaura SE8300
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedC90 Max83 hp
SE830083 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
C90 Max is in the 73rd percentile; SE8300 is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ SE8300 higher · +9 ci (+3%)C90 Max269 ci
SE8300278 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
C90 Max is in the 77th percentile; SE8300 is in the 82nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedC90 Max4
SE83004
Median Utility Tractor4
C90 Max is in the 50th percentile; SE8300 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ SE8300 higher · +4 (+33%)C90 Max12
SE830016
Median Utility Tractor12
C90 Max is in the 50th percentile; SE8300 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
C90 Max (A)SE8300 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl C90 Max | Shibaura SE8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | Shibaura | — |
| Model | C90 Max | SE8300 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl C90 Max | Shibaura SE8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Shibaura | — |
| Model | 1104D-44T | LEA1104 | — |
| Power Output | 83hp | 83hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ SE8300+800 RPM · +57% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 269ci | 278ci | ▲ SE8300+9 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ SE8300+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ C90 Max+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl C90 Max | Shibaura SE8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical shuttle | Constant mesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl C90 Max | Shibaura SE8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 154in | ▲ C90 Max+9 in · +6% |
| Width | 76.6in | 74.4in | ▲ C90 Max+2.2 in · +3% |
| Height | 99.1in | 107in | ▲ SE8300+7.9 in · +8% |
| Wheelbase | 92.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Ground Clearance | 16.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,341lb | 7,260lb | ▲ C90 Max+81 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl C90 Max | Shibaura SE8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl C90 Max | Shibaura SE8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 11.2-24 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9-30 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl C90 Max | Shibaura SE8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl C90 Max | Shibaura SE8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl C90 Max | Shibaura SE8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl C90 Max | Shibaura SE8300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (83 hp)B · 73rd percentile (83 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 77th percentile (269 ci)B · 82nd percentile (278 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 70th percentile (7,341 lb)B · 69th percentile (7,260 lb)
A · C90 MaxB · SE8300Median Utility Tractor