McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl CT47
Utility
- power
- 47 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl CT47 vs McCormick Intl X10.50H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.50H
Utility
- power
- 49 hp
- displacement
- 149 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CT47
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.50H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X10.50H higher · +2 hp (+4%)CT4747 hp
X10.50H49 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT47 is in the 41st percentile; X10.50H is in the 44th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT47 higher · +4 ci (+3%)CT47153 ci
X10.50H149 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT47 is in the 41st percentile; X10.50H is in the 38th · 5,580 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.50H higher · +352 lb (+10%)CT473,583 lb
X10.50H3,935 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT47 is in the 30th percentile; X10.50H is in the 36th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ X10.50H higher · +8 in (+6%)CT47126 in
X10.50H134 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
CT47 is in the 36th percentile; X10.50H is in the 46th · 4,659 models
CT47 (A)X10.50H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT47 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | CT47 | X10.50H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT47 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4B243L | — |
| Power Output | 47hp | 49hp | ▲ X10.50H+2 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 153ci | 149ci | ▲ CT47+4 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT47 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro shuttle | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT47 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 126in | 134in | ▲ X10.50H+8 in · +6% |
| Width | 67.2in | 63.9in | ▲ CT47+3.3 in · +5% |
| Height | 98.3in | 96.2in | ▲ CT47+2.1 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,583lb | 3,935lb | ▲ X10.50H+352 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT47 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT47 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 9.5-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 12.4-24 | 13.6-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT47 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT47 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT47 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT47 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (47 hp)B · 44th percentile (49 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 41st percentile (153 ci)B · 38th percentile (149 ci)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 30th percentile (3,583 lb)B · 36th percentile (3,935 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 36th percentile (126 in)B · 46th percentile (134 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 54th percentile (67.2 in)B · 45th percentile (63.9 in)
A · CT47B · X10.50HMedian Utility Tractor