McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl CT55U
Utility
- power
- 47 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl CT55U vs McCormick Intl X10.50M
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.50M
Utility
- power
- 49 hp
- displacement
- 149 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 12
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CT55U
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.50M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X10.50M higher · +2 hp (+4%)CT55U47 hp
X10.50M49 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT55U is in the 41st percentile; X10.50M is in the 44th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT55U higher · +4 ci (+3%)CT55U153 ci
X10.50M149 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT55U is in the 41st percentile; X10.50M is in the 38th · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ CT55U higher · +4 (+33%)CT55U16
X10.50M12
Median Utility Tractor12
CT55U is in the 73rd percentile; X10.50M is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT55U higher · +1,037 lb (+26%)CT55U5,005 lb
X10.50M3,968 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT55U is in the 48th percentile; X10.50M is in the 36th · 5,107 models
CT55U (A)X10.50M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT55U | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | CT55U | X10.50M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT55U | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4B243 | — |
| Power Output | 47hp | 49hp | ▲ X10.50M+2 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 153ci | 149ci | ▲ CT55U+4 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT55U | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT55U | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 125in | 134in | ▲ X10.50M+9 in · +7% |
| Width | 65.7in | 63.9in | ▲ CT55U+1.8 in · +3% |
| Height | 94.4in | 96.2in | ▲ X10.50M+1.8 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 5,005lb | 3,968lb | ▲ CT55U+1,037 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT55U | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT55U | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT55U | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT55U | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT55U | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT55U | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (47 hp)B · 44th percentile (49 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 41st percentile (153 ci)B · 38th percentile (149 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 48th percentile (5,005 lb)B · 36th percentile (3,968 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 34th percentile (125 in)B · 46th percentile (134 in)
A · CT55UB · X10.50MMedian Utility Tractor