Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl CT65U
Utility
- power
- 57 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl CT65U vs McCormick Intl CX50
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CX50
Utility
- power
- 53 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CT65U
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CX50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT65U higher · +4 hp (+8%)CT65U57 hp
CX5053 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT65U is in the 51st percentile; CX50 is in the 48th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT65U higher · +38 ci (+23%)CT65U203 ci
CX50165 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT65U is in the 56th percentile; CX50 is in the 44th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT65U higher · +1 (+33%)CT65U4
CX503
Median Utility Tractor4
CT65U is in the 50th percentile; CX50 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedCT65U16
CX5016
Median Utility Tractor12
CT65U is in the 73rd percentile; CX50 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
CT65U (A)CX50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | CT65U | CX50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Perkins | — |
| Power Output | 57hp | 53hp | ▲ CT65U+4 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ CT65U+250 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ CT65U+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 203ci | 165ci | ▲ CT65U+38 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.7in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ CX50+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Synch shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 140in | 160in | ▲ CX50+20 in · +14% |
| Width | 66.9in | 77.3in | ▲ CX50+10.4 in · +16% |
| Height | 96in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,401lb | 7,132lb | ▲ CX50+1,731 lb · +32% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 51st percentile (57 hp)B · 48th percentile (53 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 56th percentile (203 ci)B · 44th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,401 lb)B · 68th percentile (7,132 lb)
A · CT65UB · CX50Median Utility Tractor