Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl CX105
Utility
- power
- 102 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl CX105 vs McCormick Intl X50.40m
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X50.40m
Utility
- power
- 102 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CX105
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.40m
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCX105102 hp
X50.40m102 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CX105 is in the 84th percentile; X50.40m is in the 84th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CX105 higher · +61 ci (+29%)CX105269 ci
X50.40m208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CX105 is in the 77th percentile; X50.40m is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCX1054
X50.40m4
Median Utility Tractor4
CX105 is in the 50th percentile; X50.40m is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CX105 higher · +690 lb (+9%)CX1058,280 lb
X50.40m7,590 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CX105 is in the 77th percentile; X50.40m is in the 72nd · 5,107 models
CX105 (A)X50.40m (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | CX105 | X50.40m | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Perkins | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | 854E-E34TA | — |
| Power Output | 102hp | 102hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 269ci | 208ci | ▲ CX105+61 ci · +29% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ CX105+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.3in | ▲ CX105+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | 163in | ▲ CX105+3 in · +2% |
| Width | Not recorded | 81.2in | — |
| Height | 108in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,280lb | 7,590lb | ▲ CX105+690 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4-24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 84th percentile (102 hp)B · 84th percentile (102 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 77th percentile (269 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 77th percentile (8,280 lb)B · 72nd percentile (7,590 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 84th percentile (166 in)B · 80th percentile (163 in)
A · CX105B · X50.40mMedian Utility Tractor