Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl F100
Agricultural
- power
- 92.5 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
How they compare
F100 is in the 38th percentile; VF100 is in the 40th · 1,028 models
F100 is in the 31st percentile; VF100 is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Full comparison
| Spec | McCormick Intl F100 | McCormick Intl VF100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | F100 | VF100 | — |
| Category | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | Agricultural | — |
| Spec | McCormick Intl F100 | McCormick Intl VF100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 1104D-44TA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 92.5hp | 95hp | ▲ VF100+2.5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | Not recorded | 243ci | — |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ F100+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
| Spec | McCormick Intl F100 | McCormick Intl VF100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro shuttle | Manual | — |
| Spec | McCormick Intl F100 | McCormick Intl VF100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 193in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 52in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,765lb | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | McCormick Intl F100 | McCormick Intl VF100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | McCormick Intl F100 | McCormick Intl VF100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | McCormick Intl F100 | McCormick Intl VF100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | McCormick Intl F100 | McCormick Intl VF100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context