Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl G25
Utility
- power
- 21 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl G25 vs Mitsubishi MT25
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT25
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl G25
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT25
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT25 higher · +4 hp (+19%)G2521 hp
MT2525 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
G25 is in the 9th percentile; MT25 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT25 higher · +496 lb (+37%)G251,323 lb
MT251,819 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
G25 is in the 3rd percentile; MT25 is in the 10th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ MT25 higher · +10.2 in (+10%)G2598.8 in
MT25109 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
G25 is in the 8th percentile; MT25 is in the 15th · 4,659 models
Width
▲ MT25 higher · +20 in (+58%)G2534.3 in
MT2554.3 in
Median Utility Tractor66 in
G25 is in the 1st percentile; MT25 is in the 25th · 3,933 models
G25 (A)MT25 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl G25 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | G25 | MT25 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl G25 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | Mitsubishi | — |
| Power Output | 21hp | 25hp | ▲ MT25+4 hp · +19% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl G25 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl G25 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 98.8in | 109in | ▲ MT25+10.2 in · +10% |
| Width | 34.3in | 54.3in | ▲ MT25+20 in · +58% |
| Operating Weight | 1,323lb | 1,819lb | ▲ MT25+496 lb · +37% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl G25 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl G25 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl G25 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 9th percentile (21 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 3rd percentile (1,323 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,819 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (98.8 in)B · 15th percentile (109 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 1st percentile (34.3 in)B · 25th percentile (54.3 in)
A · G25B · MT25Median Utility Tractor