Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl G30R
Sub-Compact
- power
- 21.5 hp
- displacement
- 58.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
McCormick Intl G30R vs McCormick Intl X10.30H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.30H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 85 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl G30R
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.30H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ X10.30H higher · +6.5 hp (+30%)G30R21.5 hp
X10.30H28 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
G30R is in the 30th percentile; X10.30H is in the 53rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.30H higher · +26.8 ci (+46%)G30R58.2 ci
X10.30H85 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
G30R is in the 17th percentile; X10.30H is in the 45th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedG30R3
X10.30H3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
G30R is in the 50th percentile; X10.30H is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.30H higher · +1,574 lb (+102%)G30R1,543 lb
X10.30H3,117 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
G30R is in the 26th percentile; X10.30H is in the 59th · 711 models
G30R (A)X10.30H (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | G30R | X10.30H | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3A139 | — |
| Power Output | 21.5hp | 28hp | ▲ X10.30H+6.5 hp · +30% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ G30R+400 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 58.2ci | 85ci | ▲ X10.30H+26.8 ci · +46% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.2in | ▲ X10.30H+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 3.6in | ▲ X10.30H+0.8 in · +29% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 104in | 122in | ▲ X10.30H+18 in · +17% |
| Width | 37.7in | 54.6in | ▲ X10.30H+16.9 in · +45% |
| Height | 79.1in | 96.8in | ▲ X10.30H+17.7 in · +22% |
| Operating Weight | 1,543lb | 3,117lb | ▲ X10.30H+1,574 lb · +102% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 30th percentile (21.5 hp)B · 53rd percentile (28 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 17th percentile (58.2 ci)B · 45th percentile (85 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 26th percentile (1,543 lb)B · 59th percentile (3,117 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 35th percentile (104 in)B · 64th percentile (122 in)
A · G30RB · X10.30HMedian Sub-Compact Tractor