Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl G30R
Sub-Compact
- power
- 21.5 hp
- displacement
- 58.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
McCormick Intl G30R vs Mitsubishi MT210
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT210
Sub-Compact
- power
- 21 hp
- displacement
- 59.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl G30R
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ G30R higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)G30R21.5 hp
MT21021 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
G30R is in the 30th percentile; MT210 is in the 28th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT210 higher · +1.5 ci (+3%)G30R58.2 ci
MT21059.7 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
G30R is in the 17th percentile; MT210 is in the 18th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedG30R3
MT2103
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
G30R is in the 50th percentile; MT210 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT210 higher · +177 lb (+11%)G30R1,543 lb
MT2101,720 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
G30R is in the 26th percentile; MT210 is in the 31st · 711 models
G30R (A)MT210 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | G30R | MT210 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Not recorded | K3D | — |
| Power Output | 21.5hp | 21hp | ▲ G30R+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ G30R+300 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 58.2ci | 59.7ci | ▲ MT210+1.5 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3in | 2.9in | ▲ G30R+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 3.1in | ▲ MT210+0.3 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 104in | 102in | ▲ G30R+2 in · +2% |
| Width | 37.7in | 44.1in | ▲ MT210+6.4 in · +17% |
| Height | 79.1in | 53.3in | ▲ G30R+25.8 in · +48% |
| Operating Weight | 1,543lb | 1,720lb | ▲ MT210+177 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | McCormick Intl G30R | Mitsubishi MT210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 30th percentile (21.5 hp)B · 28th percentile (21 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 17th percentile (58.2 ci)B · 18th percentile (59.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 26th percentile (1,543 lb)B · 31st percentile (1,720 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 35th percentile (104 in)B · 33rd percentile (102 in)
A · G30RB · MT210Median Sub-Compact Tractor