McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl GM50
Utility
- power
- 47.5 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl GM50 vs McCormick Intl X10.50H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.50H
Utility
- power
- 49 hp
- displacement
- 149 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl GM50
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.50H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X10.50H higher · +1.5 hp (+3%)GM5047.5 hp
X10.50H49 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GM50 is in the 43rd percentile; X10.50H is in the 44th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.50H higher · +15 ci (+11%)GM50134 ci
X10.50H149 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GM50 is in the 31st percentile; X10.50H is in the 38th · 5,580 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.50H higher · +738 lb (+23%)GM503,197 lb
X10.50H3,935 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GM50 is in the 25th percentile; X10.50H is in the 36th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ X10.50H higher · +4 in (+3%)GM50130 in
X10.50H134 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
GM50 is in the 41st percentile; X10.50H is in the 46th · 4,659 models
GM50 (A)X10.50H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl GM50 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | GM50 | X10.50H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl GM50 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Daedong | — |
| Model | 4TNV88 | 4B243L | — |
| Power Output | 47.5hp | 49hp | ▲ X10.50H+1.5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ GM50+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 134ci | 149ci | ▲ X10.50H+15 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl GM50 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Creeper | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl GM50 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 130in | 134in | ▲ X10.50H+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 55in | 63.9in | ▲ X10.50H+8.9 in · +16% |
| Height | Not recorded | 96.2in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,197lb | 3,935lb | ▲ X10.50H+738 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl GM50 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl GM50 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl GM50 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl GM50 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl GM50 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl GM50 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS/Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 43rd percentile (47.5 hp)B · 44th percentile (49 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 31st percentile (134 ci)B · 38th percentile (149 ci)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 25th percentile (3,197 lb)B · 36th percentile (3,935 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 41st percentile (130 in)B · 46th percentile (134 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 27th percentile (55 in)B · 45th percentile (63.9 in)
A · GM50B · X10.50HMedian Utility Tractor