McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl GX50
Utility
- power
- 49 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl GX50 vs McCormick Intl X10.50M
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.50M
Utility
- power
- 49 hp
- displacement
- 149 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 12
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl GX50
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.50M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedGX5049 hp
X10.50M49 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GX50 is in the 44th percentile; X10.50M is in the 44th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.50M higher · +15 ci (+11%)GX50134 ci
X10.50M149 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GX50 is in the 31st percentile; X10.50M is in the 38th · 5,580 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.50M higher · +771 lb (+24%)GX503,197 lb
X10.50M3,968 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GX50 is in the 25th percentile; X10.50M is in the 36th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ GX50 higher · +1 in (<1%)GX50135 in
X10.50M134 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
GX50 is in the 47th percentile; X10.50M is in the 46th · 4,659 models
GX50 (A)X10.50M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl GX50 | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | GX50 | X10.50M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl GX50 | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4B243 | — |
| Power Output | 49hp | 49hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ GX50+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 134ci | 149ci | ▲ X10.50M+15 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl GX50 | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Synchronized shuttle | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl GX50 | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 135in | 134in | ▲ GX50+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 54.5in | 63.9in | ▲ X10.50M+9.4 in · +17% |
| Height | 57.1in | 96.2in | ▲ X10.50M+39.1 in · +68% |
| Operating Weight | 3,197lb | 3,968lb | ▲ X10.50M+771 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl GX50 | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl GX50 | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl GX50 | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl GX50 | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl GX50 | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl GX50 | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 44th percentile (49 hp)B · 44th percentile (49 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 31st percentile (134 ci)B · 38th percentile (149 ci)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 25th percentile (3,197 lb)B · 36th percentile (3,968 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 47th percentile (135 in)B · 46th percentile (134 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 26th percentile (54.5 in)B · 45th percentile (63.9 in)
A · GX50B · X10.50MMedian Utility Tractor