McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl T100
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl T100 vs McCormick Intl X50.30m
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X50.30m
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl T100
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.30m
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedT10095 hp
X50.30m95 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T100 is in the 81st percentile; X50.30m is in the 81st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T100 higher · +61 ci (+29%)T100269 ci
X50.30m208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T100 is in the 77th percentile; X50.30m is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedT1004
X50.30m4
Median Utility Tractor4
T100 is in the 50th percentile; X50.30m is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ X50.30m higher · +8 (+50%)T10016
X50.30m24
Median Utility Tractor12
T100 is in the 73rd percentile; X50.30m is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
T100 (A)X50.30m (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl T100 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | T100 | X50.30m | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl T100 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Perkins | Same |
| Model | 1104D-44T | 854E-E34TA | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 95hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 269ci | 208ci | ▲ T100+61 ci · +29% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ T100+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.3in | ▲ T100+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl T100 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl T100 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 138in | 163in | ▲ X50.30m+25 in · +18% |
| Width | 66.9in | 81.2in | ▲ X50.30m+14.3 in · +21% |
| Height | 50.8in | 100in | ▲ X50.30m+49.2 in · +97% |
| Operating Weight | 11,311lb | 7,326lb | ▲ T100+3,985 lb · +54% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl T100 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl T100 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | CAT II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl T100 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl T100 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl T100 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS/Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 81st percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 77th percentile (269 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 89th percentile (11,311 lb)B · 70th percentile (7,326 lb)
A · T100B · X50.30mMedian Utility Tractor