Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X1.25
Sub-Compact
- power
- 24 hp
- displacement
- 73.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Sub-Compact
McCormick Intl X1.25 vs New Holland TZ24D
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TZ24D
Utility
- power
- 24 hp
- displacement
- 61.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X1.25
vs
New HollandNew Holland TZ24D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedX1.2524 hp
TZ24D24 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
X1.25 is in the 39th percentile; TZ24D is in the 39th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X1.25 higher · +11.9 ci (+19%)X1.2573.2 ci
TZ24D61.3 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
X1.25 is in the 35th percentile; TZ24D is in the 23rd · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedX1.253
TZ24D3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
X1.25 is in the 50th percentile; TZ24D is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ X1.25 higher · +350 lb (+24%)X1.251,810 lb
TZ24D1,460 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
X1.25 is in the 32nd percentile; TZ24D is in the 20th · 711 models
X1.25 (A)TZ24D (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | New Holland | — |
| Model | X1.25 | TZ24D | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kukje | Shibaura | — |
| Power Output | 24hp | 24hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ TZ24D+400 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 73.2ci | 61.3ci | ▲ X1.25+11.9 ci · +19% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 2.8in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 80.6in | ▲ X1.25+25.4 in · +32% |
| Width | Not recorded | 46.5in | — |
| Height | 88in | 89.8in | ▲ TZ24D+1.8 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 1,810lb | 1,460lb | ▲ X1.25+350 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | New Holland TZ24D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 39th percentile (24 hp)B · 39th percentile (24 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 35th percentile (73.2 ci)B · 23rd percentile (61.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 32nd percentile (1,810 lb)B · 20th percentile (1,460 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 40th percentile (106 in)B · 9th percentile (80.6 in)
A · X1.25B · TZ24DMedian Sub-Compact Tractor