Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X1.37
Sub-Compact
- power
- 37 hp
- displacement
- 127 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Sub-Compact
McCormick Intl X1.37 vs McCormick Intl X10.30H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.30H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 85 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X1.37
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.30H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ X1.37 higher · +9 hp (+32%)X1.3737 hp
X10.30H28 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
X1.37 is in the 70th percentile; X10.30H is in the 53rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X1.37 higher · +42 ci (+49%)X1.37127 ci
X10.30H85 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
X1.37 is in the 71st percentile; X10.30H is in the 45th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ X1.37 higher · +1 (+33%)X1.374
X10.30H3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
X1.37 is in the 90th percentile; X10.30H is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ X1.37 higher · +1,078 lb (+35%)X1.374,195 lb
X10.30H3,117 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
X1.37 is in the 83rd percentile; X10.30H is in the 59th · 711 models
X1.37 (A)X10.30H (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.37 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | X1.37 | X10.30H | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.37 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kukje | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3A139 | — |
| Power Output | 37hp | 28hp | ▲ X1.37+9 hp · +32% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ X1.37+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 127ci | 85ci | ▲ X1.37+42 ci · +49% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.2in | ▲ X1.37+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 3.7in | 3.6in | ▲ X1.37+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.37 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.37 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 122in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 54.6in | — |
| Height | 96.8in | 96.8in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 4,195lb | 3,117lb | ▲ X1.37+1,078 lb · +35% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.37 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.37 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.37 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.37 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.37 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier IV | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | Diesel oxidation catalyst and diesel particulate filter (DPF) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.37 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 70th percentile (37 hp)B · 53rd percentile (28 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 71st percentile (127 ci)B · 45th percentile (85 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 90th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 83rd percentile (4,195 lb)B · 59th percentile (3,117 lb)
Height
median 78.4 inA · 92nd percentile (96.8 in)B · 92nd percentile (96.8 in)
A · X1.37B · X10.30HMedian Sub-Compact Tractor