Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X1.45
Utility
- power
- 47 hp
- displacement
- 140 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl X1.45 vs McCormick Intl X10.50H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.50H
Utility
- power
- 49 hp
- displacement
- 149 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X1.45
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.50H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X10.50H higher · +2 hp (+4%)X1.4547 hp
X10.50H49 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
X1.45 is in the 41st percentile; X10.50H is in the 44th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.50H higher · +9 ci (+6%)X1.45140 ci
X10.50H149 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
X1.45 is in the 36th percentile; X10.50H is in the 38th · 5,580 models
Operating Weight
▲ X1.45 higher · +180 lb (+5%)X1.454,115 lb
X10.50H3,935 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
X1.45 is in the 38th percentile; X10.50H is in the 36th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ X10.50H higher · +4 in (+3%)X1.45130 in
X10.50H134 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
X1.45 is in the 41st percentile; X10.50H is in the 46th · 4,659 models
X1.45 (A)X10.50H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.45 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | X1.45 | X10.50H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.45 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kukje | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4B243L | — |
| Power Output | 47hp | 49hp | ▲ X10.50H+2 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 140ci | 149ci | ▲ X10.50H+9 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.45 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized Shuttle | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.45 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 130in | 134in | ▲ X10.50H+4 in · +3% |
| Width | Not recorded | 63.9in | — |
| Height | 94in | 96.2in | ▲ X10.50H+2.2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 4,115lb | 3,935lb | ▲ X1.45+180 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.45 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.45 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.45 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.45 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.45 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.45 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (47 hp)B · 44th percentile (49 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 36th percentile (140 ci)B · 38th percentile (149 ci)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 38th percentile (4,115 lb)B · 36th percentile (3,935 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 41st percentile (130 in)B · 46th percentile (134 in)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 50th percentile (94 in)B · 55th percentile (96.2 in)
A · X1.45B · X10.50HMedian Utility Tractor