Head to head · Utility

McCormick Intl X1.45 vs New Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)

Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A

McCormick Intl X1.45

Utility

power
47 hp
displacement
140 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
12
Full X1.45 specs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X1.45
vs
New HollandNew Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 4,659–5,720

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
X1.4547 hp
Boomer 50 (2011-2013)47 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

X1.45 is in the 41st percentile; Boomer 50 (2011-2013) is in the 41st · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Boomer 50 (2011-2013) higher · +13 ci (+9%)
X1.45140 ci
Boomer 50 (2011-2013)153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

X1.45 is in the 36th percentile; Boomer 50 (2011-2013) is in the 41st · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
X1.454
Boomer 50 (2011-2013)4
Median Utility Tractor4

X1.45 is in the 50th percentile; Boomer 50 (2011-2013) is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ Boomer 50 (2011-2013) higher · +4 (+33%)
X1.4512
Boomer 50 (2011-2013)16
Median Utility Tractor12

X1.45 is in the 50th percentile; Boomer 50 (2011-2013) is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

X1.45 (A)Boomer 50 (2011-2013) (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecMcCormick Intl X1.45New Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)Difference
ManufacturerMcCormick IntlNew Holland—
ModelX1.45Boomer 50 (2011-2013)—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecMcCormick Intl X1.45New Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)Difference
ManufacturerKukjeMitsubishi—
ModelNot recordedS4Q2—
Power Output47hp47hpSame
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,600RPMSame
Cylinders44Same
Displacement140ci153ci▲ Boomer 50 (2011-2013)+13 ci · +9%
Bore3.5in3.5inSame
Stroke3.7in4.1in▲ Boomer 50 (2011-2013)+0.4 in · +11%

Transmission

SpecMcCormick Intl X1.45New Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)Difference
TypeSynchronized ShuttleSynchronized shuttleSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecMcCormick Intl X1.45New Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)Difference
Length130in121in▲ X1.45+9 in · +7%
WidthNot recorded63.8in—
Height94inNot recorded—
Operating Weight4,115lb3,549lb▲ X1.45+566 lb · +16%

Hydraulics

SpecMcCormick Intl X1.45New Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic power—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecMcCormick Intl X1.45New Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)Difference
Speed 1Not recorded2,000rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded540rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecMcCormick Intl X1.45New Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryCategory 3I—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch CapacityNot recorded2,756lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecMcCormick Intl X1.45New Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic power—
Brake TypeNot recordedDifferential mechanical wet disc—

Electrical

SpecMcCormick Intl X1.45New Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecMcCormick Intl X1.45New Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)Difference
TypeROPSTwo-post foldable ROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 41st percentile (47 hp)B · 41st percentile (47 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 36th percentile (140 ci)B · 41st percentile (153 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 38th percentile (4,115 lb)B · 30th percentile (3,549 lb)
A · X1.45B · Boomer 50 (2011-2013)Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageMcCormick Intl X1.45Full spec pageNew Holland Boomer 50 (2011-2013)