Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X10.35H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
McCormick Intl X10.35H vs New Holland T3010
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T3010
Sub-Compact
- power
- 34.7 hp
- displacement
- 100 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.35H
vs
New HollandNew Holland T3010
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ T3010 higher · +0.7 hp (+2%)X10.35H34 hp
T301034.7 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
X10.35H is in the 62nd percentile; T3010 is in the 63rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.35H higher · +1 ci (+1%)X10.35H101 ci
T3010100 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
X10.35H is in the 58th percentile; T3010 is in the 57th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedX10.35H3
T30103
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
X10.35H is in the 50th percentile; T3010 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ T3010 higher · +83 lb (+3%)X10.35H3,114 lb
T30103,197 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
X10.35H is in the 58th percentile; T3010 is in the 60th · 711 models
X10.35H (A)T3010 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.35H | New Holland T3010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | New Holland | — |
| Model | X10.35H | T3010 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.35H | New Holland T3010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 3A165 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 34hp | 34.7hp | ▲ T3010+0.7 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ T3010+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 101ci | 100ci | ▲ X10.35H+1 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.35H | New Holland T3010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | synchro shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.35H | New Holland T3010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 130in | ▲ T3010+8 in · +7% |
| Width | 54.6in | 52.1in | ▲ X10.35H+2.5 in · +5% |
| Height | 96.8in | 74.8in | ▲ X10.35H+22 in · +29% |
| Operating Weight | 3,114lb | 3,197lb | ▲ T3010+83 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.35H | New Holland T3010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Gear pump | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.35H | New Holland T3010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.35H | New Holland T3010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.35H | New Holland T3010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.35H | New Holland T3010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 62nd percentile (34 hp)B · 63rd percentile (34.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 58th percentile (101 ci)B · 57th percentile (100 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 58th percentile (3,114 lb)B · 60th percentile (3,197 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 64th percentile (122 in)B · 78th percentile (130 in)
A · X10.35HB · T3010Median Sub-Compact Tractor