Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X10.50M
Utility
- power
- 49 hp
- displacement
- 149 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl X10.50M vs Mitsubishi MT508
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT508
Utility
- power
- 50 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.50M
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT508
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT508 higher · +1 hp (+2%)X10.50M49 hp
MT50850 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
X10.50M is in the 44th percentile; MT508 is in the 45th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT508 higher · +4 ci (+3%)X10.50M149 ci
MT508153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
X10.50M is in the 38th percentile; MT508 is in the 40th · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT508 higher · +4 (+33%)X10.50M12
MT50816
Median Utility Tractor12
X10.50M is in the 50th percentile; MT508 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT508 higher · +22 lb (<1%)X10.50M3,968 lb
MT5083,990 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
X10.50M is in the 36th percentile; MT508 is in the 36th · 5,107 models
X10.50M (A)MT508 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Mitsubishi MT508 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | X10.50M | MT508 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Mitsubishi MT508 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 4B243 | S4Q2 | — |
| Power Output | 49hp | 50hp | ▲ MT508+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ MT508+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 149ci | 153ci | ▲ MT508+4 ci · +3% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.5in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Mitsubishi MT508 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Mitsubishi MT508 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 134in | 138in | ▲ MT508+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 63.9in | 61.2in | ▲ X10.50M+2.7 in · +4% |
| Height | 96.2in | 93.9in | ▲ X10.50M+2.3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,968lb | 3,990lb | ▲ MT508+22 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Mitsubishi MT508 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Gear pump | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Mitsubishi MT508 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 13.6-24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Mitsubishi MT508 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Mitsubishi MT508 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Mitsubishi MT508 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.50M | Mitsubishi MT508 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 44th percentile (49 hp)B · 45th percentile (50 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 38th percentile (149 ci)B · 40th percentile (153 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 36th percentile (3,968 lb)B · 36th percentile (3,990 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 46th percentile (134 in)B · 52nd percentile (138 in)
A · X10.50MB · MT508Median Utility Tractor