Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X4.50
Utility
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 219 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl X4.50 vs McCormick Intl X50.20
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X50.20
Utility
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X4.50
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.20
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedX4.5085 hp
X50.2085 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
X4.50 is in the 75th percentile; X50.20 is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X4.50 higher · +11 ci (+5%)X4.50219 ci
X50.20208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
X4.50 is in the 60th percentile; X50.20 is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedX4.504
X50.204
Median Utility Tractor4
X4.50 is in the 50th percentile; X50.20 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ X50.20 higher · +990 lb (+14%)X4.507,040 lb
X50.208,030 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
X4.50 is in the 67th percentile; X50.20 is in the 76th · 5,107 models
X4.50 (A)X50.20 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X4.50 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | X4.50 | X50.20 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X4.50 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | Perkins | — |
| Model | C4DT62 | 854E-E34TA | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 219ci | 208ci | ▲ X4.50+11 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 3.8in | 3.9in | ▲ X50.20+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.3in | ▲ X4.50+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X4.50 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Multiple - See Additional Notes | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X4.50 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 170in | 164in | ▲ X4.50+6 in · +4% |
| Width | 69in | 83in | ▲ X50.20+14 in · +20% |
| Height | 102in | 101in | ▲ X4.50+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 7,040lb | 8,030lb | ▲ X50.20+990 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X4.50 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl X4.50 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 380/70R24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/70R34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X4.50 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X4.50 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X4.50 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | McCormick Intl X4.50 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl X4.50 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 60th percentile (219 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 67th percentile (7,040 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,030 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 86th percentile (170 in)B · 82nd percentile (164 in)
A · X4.50B · X50.20Median Utility Tractor