Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X5.20
Utility
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 36
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl X5.20 vs McCormick Intl X50.20m
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X50.20m
Utility
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X5.20
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.20m
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedX5.2085 hp
X50.20m85 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
X5.20 is in the 75th percentile; X50.20m is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedX5.20208 ci
X50.20m208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
X5.20 is in the 58th percentile; X50.20m is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedX5.204
X50.20m4
Median Utility Tractor4
X5.20 is in the 50th percentile; X50.20m is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ X5.20 higher · +12 (+50%)X5.2036
X50.20m24
Median Utility Tractor12
X5.20 is in the 99th percentile; X50.20m is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
X5.20 (A)X50.20m (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X5.20 | McCormick Intl X50.20m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | X5.20 | X50.20m | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X5.20 | McCormick Intl X50.20m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Perkins | Same |
| Model | 854E-E34TA | 854E-E34TA | Same |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 208ci | 208ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X5.20 | McCormick Intl X50.20m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Xtrashift | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X5.20 | McCormick Intl X50.20m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 163in | Same |
| Width | 83.5in | 81.2in | ▲ X5.20+2.3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 7,326lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X5.20 | McCormick Intl X50.20m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X5.20 | McCormick Intl X50.20m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X5.20 | McCormick Intl X50.20m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X5.20 | McCormick Intl X50.20m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | McCormick Intl X5.20 | McCormick Intl X50.20m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Interim Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | EGR | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl X5.20 | McCormick Intl X50.20m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS / Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 58th percentile (208 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 99th percentile (36)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Length
median 137 inA · 81st percentile (163 in)B · 80th percentile (163 in)
A · X5.20B · X50.20mMedian Utility Tractor