Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X50.30
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 32
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl X50.30 vs McCormick Intl X50.30m
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X50.30m
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.30
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.30m
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedX50.3095 hp
X50.30m95 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
X50.30 is in the 81st percentile; X50.30m is in the 81st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedX50.30208 ci
X50.30m208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
X50.30 is in the 58th percentile; X50.30m is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedX50.304
X50.30m4
Median Utility Tractor4
X50.30 is in the 50th percentile; X50.30m is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ X50.30 higher · +8 (+33%)X50.3032
X50.30m24
Median Utility Tractor12
X50.30 is in the 97th percentile; X50.30m is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
X50.30 (A)X50.30m (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | X50.30 | X50.30m | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Perkins | Same |
| Model | 854E-E34TA | 854E-E34TA | Same |
| Power Output | 95hp | 95hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 208ci | 208ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical shuttle and power shuttle | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 164in | 163in | ▲ X50.30+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 83in | 81.2in | ▲ X50.30+1.8 in · +2% |
| Height | 101in | 100in | ▲ X50.30+1 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 8,030lb | 7,326lb | ▲ X50.30+704 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | EGR | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS/Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 81st percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 58th percentile (208 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 97th percentile (32)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 76th percentile (8,030 lb)B · 70th percentile (7,326 lb)
A · X50.30B · X50.30mMedian Utility Tractor