Head to head · Utility

McCormick Intl X50.30 vs New Holland Workmaster 95

Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A

McCormick Intl X50.30

Utility

power
95 hp
displacement
208 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
32
Full X50.30 specs
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B

New Holland Workmaster 95

Utility

power
97 hp
displacement
207 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
12
Full Workmaster 95 specs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.30
vs
New HollandNew Holland Workmaster 95

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 4,321–5,720

Engine Power

▲ Workmaster 95 higher · +2 hp (+2%)
X50.3095 hp
Workmaster 9597 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

X50.30 is in the 81st percentile; Workmaster 95 is in the 82nd · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ X50.30 higher · +1 ci (<1%)
X50.30208 ci
Workmaster 95207 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

X50.30 is in the 58th percentile; Workmaster 95 is in the 57th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
X50.304
Workmaster 954
Median Utility Tractor4

X50.30 is in the 50th percentile; Workmaster 95 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ X50.30 higher · +20 (+167%)
X50.3032
Workmaster 9512
Median Utility Tractor12

X50.30 is in the 97th percentile; Workmaster 95 is in the 50th · 4,941 models

X50.30 (A)Workmaster 95 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecMcCormick Intl X50.30New Holland Workmaster 95Difference
ManufacturerMcCormick IntlNew Holland—
ModelX50.30Workmaster 95—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecMcCormick Intl X50.30New Holland Workmaster 95Difference
ManufacturerPerkinsFPT—
Model854E-E34TAF5—
Power Output95hp97hp▲ Workmaster 95+2 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,300RPM▲ Workmaster 95+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders44Same
Displacement208ci207ci▲ X50.30+1 ci · <1%
Bore3.9in3.9inSame
Stroke4.3in4.3inSame

Transmission

SpecMcCormick Intl X50.30New Holland Workmaster 95Difference
TypeMechanical shuttle and power shuttle12-speed power shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecMcCormick Intl X50.30New Holland Workmaster 95Difference
Length164in161in▲ X50.30+3 in · +2%
Width83inNot recorded—
Height101in103in▲ Workmaster 95+2 in · +2%
Operating Weight8,030lb7,738lb▲ X50.30+292 lb · +4%

Hydraulics

SpecMcCormick Intl X50.30New Holland Workmaster 95Difference
System TypeNot recordedOpen center—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower—

Tires

SpecMcCormick Intl X50.30New Holland Workmaster 95Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded12.4-24—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded18.4-30—

Hitch & Towing

SpecMcCormick Intl X50.30New Holland Workmaster 95Difference
Hitch TypeCategory IIRear Type: II/I—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecMcCormick Intl X50.30New Holland Workmaster 95Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower—

Electrical

SpecMcCormick Intl X50.30New Holland Workmaster 95Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecMcCormick Intl X50.30New Holland Workmaster 95Difference
Control SystemEGRNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecMcCormick Intl X50.30New Holland Workmaster 95Difference
TypeROPS/CabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 82nd percentile (97 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 58th percentile (208 ci)B · 57th percentile (207 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 97th percentile (32)B · 50th percentile (12)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 76th percentile (8,030 lb)B · 73rd percentile (7,738 lb)
A · X50.30B · Workmaster 95Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageMcCormick Intl X50.30Full spec pageNew Holland Workmaster 95