Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X50.30m
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl X50.30m vs New Holland Workmaster 95
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland Workmaster 95
Utility
- power
- 97 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.30m
vs
New HollandNew Holland Workmaster 95
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Workmaster 95 higher · +2 hp (+2%)X50.30m95 hp
Workmaster 9597 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
X50.30m is in the 81st percentile; Workmaster 95 is in the 82nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X50.30m higher · +1 ci (<1%)X50.30m208 ci
Workmaster 95207 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
X50.30m is in the 58th percentile; Workmaster 95 is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedX50.30m4
Workmaster 954
Median Utility Tractor4
X50.30m is in the 50th percentile; Workmaster 95 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ X50.30m higher · +12 (+100%)X50.30m24
Workmaster 9512
Median Utility Tractor12
X50.30m is in the 92nd percentile; Workmaster 95 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
X50.30m (A)Workmaster 95 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30m | New Holland Workmaster 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | New Holland | — |
| Model | X50.30m | Workmaster 95 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30m | New Holland Workmaster 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | FPT | — |
| Model | 854E-E34TA | F5 | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 97hp | ▲ Workmaster 95+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Workmaster 95+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 208ci | 207ci | ▲ X50.30m+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30m | New Holland Workmaster 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical shuttle | 12-speed power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30m | New Holland Workmaster 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 161in | ▲ X50.30m+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 81.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 100in | 103in | ▲ Workmaster 95+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 7,326lb | 7,738lb | ▲ Workmaster 95+412 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30m | New Holland Workmaster 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30m | New Holland Workmaster 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4-24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30m | New Holland Workmaster 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type: II/I | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30m | New Holland Workmaster 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.30m | New Holland Workmaster 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 82nd percentile (97 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 58th percentile (208 ci)B · 57th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 70th percentile (7,326 lb)B · 73rd percentile (7,738 lb)
A · X50.30mB · Workmaster 95Median Utility Tractor