Head to head · Utility
Ford 5000 vs Mitsubishi D2500
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi D2500
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 5000
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi D2500
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5000 higher · +44.1 hp (+176%)500069.1 hp
D250025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5000 is in the 62nd percentile; D2500 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Cylinders
▲ 5000 higher · +2 (+100%)50004
D25002
Median Utility Tractor4
5000 is in the 50th percentile; D2500 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
5000 (A)D2500 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Mitsubishi D2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 5000 | D2500 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Mitsubishi D2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Mitsubishi | — |
| Power Output | 69.1hp | 25hp | ▲ 5000+44.1 hp · +176% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 2 | ▲ 5000+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 233ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Mitsubishi D2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Mitsubishi D2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 68.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 63.4in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Mitsubishi D2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Mitsubishi D2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Mitsubishi D2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Mitsubishi D2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Mitsubishi D2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Mitsubishi D2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Mitsubishi D2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 62nd percentile (69.1 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 3rd percentile (2)
A · 5000B · D2500Median Utility Tractor