Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel A
Mitsubishi MT250
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 78.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Mitsubishi MT250 vs TYM T25
TYMModel B
TYM T25
Sub-Compact
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 77.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT250
vs
TYMTYM T25
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ MT250 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)MT25025 hp
T2524.7 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
MT250 is in the 46th percentile; T25 is in the 43rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT250 higher · +1.4 ci (+2%)MT25078.7 ci
T2577.3 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
MT250 is in the 38th percentile; T25 is in the 37th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT2503
T253
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
MT250 is in the 50th percentile; T25 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT250 higher · +59 lb (+3%)MT2501,940 lb
T251,881 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
MT250 is in the 35th percentile; T25 is in the 34th · 711 models
MT250 (A)T25 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | TYM T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | TYM | — |
| Model | MT250 | T25 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | TYM T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Yanmar | — |
| Model | K3H | 3TNV80F | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 24.7hp | ▲ MT250+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ T25+300 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 78.7ci | 77.3ci | ▲ MT250+1.4 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.2in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.3in | ▲ MT250+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | TYM T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | TYM T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 103in | 108in | ▲ T25+5 in · +5% |
| Width | 46.9in | 52.8in | ▲ T25+5.9 in · +13% |
| Height | 54.3in | 89.8in | ▲ T25+35.5 in · +65% |
| Operating Weight | 1,940lb | 1,881lb | ▲ MT250+59 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | TYM T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | TYM T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 5.00-15 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 11.2/10-24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | TYM T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | TYM T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | TYM T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | TYM T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | TYM T25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 46th percentile (25 hp)B · 43rd percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 38th percentile (78.7 ci)B · 37th percentile (77.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 35th percentile (1,940 lb)B · 34th percentile (1,881 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 34th percentile (103 in)B · 42nd percentile (108 in)
A · MT250B · T25Median Sub-Compact Tractor