Head to head · Sub-Compact

Mitsubishi MT305 vs Rhino 304

Mitsubishi MT305 Tractor
MitsubishiModel A

Mitsubishi MT305

Sub-Compact

power
30 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
16
Full MT305 specs
Image not recorded
RhinoModel B

Rhino 304

Agricultural

power
30 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 304 specs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT305
vs
RhinoRhino 304

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 816–816

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
MT30530 hp
30430 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

MT305 is in the 57th percentile; 304 is in the 57th · 816 models

MT305 (A)304 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecMitsubishi MT305Rhino 304Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiRhino—
ModelMT305304—
CategorySub-CompactAgricultural—

Engine

SpecMitsubishi MT305Rhino 304Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiNot recorded—
Power Output30hp30hpSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecMitsubishi MT305Rhino 304Difference
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII—

Chassis & Drive

SpecMitsubishi MT305Rhino 304Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—

Electrical

SpecMitsubishi MT305Rhino 304Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 57th percentile (30 hp)B · 57th percentile (30 hp)
A · MT305B · 304Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageMitsubishi MT305Full spec pageRhino 304