Image not recorded
RenaultModel A
Renault 75-12 RS
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Utility

Agricultural
How they compare
75-12 RS is in the 68th percentile; 80-32 PX is in the 68th · 5,383 models
75-12 RS is in the 72nd percentile; 80-32 PX is in the 70th · 5,580 models
75-12 RS is in the 50th percentile; 80-32 PX is in the 50th · 5,720 models
75-12 RS is in the 50th percentile; 80-32 PX is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault 80-32 PX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Renault | Renault | Same |
| Model | 75-12 RS | 80-32 PX | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault 80-32 PX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MWM | Perkins | — |
| Model | D226-4 | 4-248 | — |
| Power Output | 75hp | 75hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,350RPM | 2,350RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 254ci | 248ci | ▲ 75-12 RS+6 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4in | ▲ 75-12 RS+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ 80-32 PX+0.3 in · +6% |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault 80-32 PX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault 80-32 PX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 159in | 159in | Same |
| Height | 103in | 98.4in | ▲ 75-12 RS+4.6 in · +5% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 94.1in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,880lb | 7,100lb | ▲ 80-32 PX+220 lb · +3% |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault 80-32 PX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault 80-32 PX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 9.00-16 | 7.50-18 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9-34 | 16.9-34 | Same |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault 80-32 PX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Category context