Head to head · Utility
SAME 240 vs SAME Solaris 50
Image not recorded
SAMEModel B
SAME Solaris 50
Utility
- power
- 47 hp
- displacement
- 107 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
SAMESAME 240
vs
SAMESAME Solaris 50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Solaris 50 higher · +5 hp (+12%)24042 hp
Solaris 5047 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
240 is in the 36th percentile; Solaris 50 is in the 41st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 240 higher · +45 ci (+42%)240152 ci
Solaris 50107 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
240 is in the 39th percentile; Solaris 50 is in the 25th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Solaris 50 higher · +2 (+100%)2402
Solaris 504
Median Utility Tractor4
240 is in the 3rd percentile; Solaris 50 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Solaris 50 higher · +6 (+100%)2406
Solaris 5012
Median Utility Tractor12
240 is in the 11th percentile; Solaris 50 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
240 (A)Solaris 50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | SAME 240 | SAME Solaris 50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME | SAME | Same |
| Model | 240 | Solaris 50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | SAME 240 | SAME Solaris 50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | DA 1152 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 42hp | 47hp | ▲ Solaris 50+5 hp · +12% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ Solaris 50+1,000 RPM · +50% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ Solaris 50+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 152ci | 107ci | ▲ 240+45 ci · +42% |
| Bore | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | SAME 240 | SAME Solaris 50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear/Creeper | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | SAME 240 | SAME Solaris 50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 117in | ▲ Solaris 50+7 in · +6% |
| Width | 63in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 57.9in | 79.5in | ▲ Solaris 50+21.6 in · +37% |
| Operating Weight | 4,026lb | 2,910lb | ▲ 240+1,116 lb · +38% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | SAME 240 | SAME Solaris 50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | SAME 240 | SAME Solaris 50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00-16 | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | SAME 240 | SAME Solaris 50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | SAME 240 | SAME Solaris 50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 36th percentile (42 hp)B · 41st percentile (47 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 39th percentile (152 ci)B · 25th percentile (107 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 37th percentile (4,026 lb)B · 21st percentile (2,910 lb)
A · 240B · Solaris 50Median Utility Tractor