Image not recorded
SAMEModel A
SAME Antares 110
Row Crop
- power
- 109 hp
- displacement
- 366 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
SAME Antares 110 vs SAME Tiger Six 105
SAMEModel B
SAME Tiger Six 105
Row Crop
- power
- 105 hp
- displacement
- 331 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
SAMESAME Antares 110
vs
SAMESAME Tiger Six 105
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Antares 110 higher · +4 hp (+4%)Antares 110109 hp
Tiger Six 105105 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Antares 110 is in the 31st percentile; Tiger Six 105 is in the 28th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Antares 110 higher · +35 ci (+11%)Antares 110366 ci
Tiger Six 105331 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Antares 110 is in the 45th percentile; Tiger Six 105 is in the 36th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedAntares 1106
Tiger Six 1056
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Antares 110 is in the 50th percentile; Tiger Six 105 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Antares 110 higher · +12 (+100%)Antares 11024
Tiger Six 10512
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Antares 110 is in the 81st percentile; Tiger Six 105 is in the 27th · 1,200 models
Antares 110 (A)Tiger Six 105 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | SAME Antares 110 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME | SAME | Same |
| Model | Antares 110 | Tiger Six 105 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | SAME Antares 110 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME | SAME | Same |
| Model | 1000.6 A | 986P | — |
| Power Output | 109hp | 105hp | ▲ Antares 110+4 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Antares 110+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 366ci | 331ci | ▲ Antares 110+35 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ Antares 110+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ Tiger Six 105+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | SAME Antares 110 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Syncromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | SAME Antares 110 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 183in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 87.2in | 87.4in | ▲ Tiger Six 105+0.2 in · <1% |
| Height | 109in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 10,251lb | 8,333lb | ▲ Antares 110+1,918 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | SAME Antares 110 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | SAME Antares 110 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 16.9R24 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R34 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | SAME Antares 110 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | SAME Antares 110 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | SAME Antares 110 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | SAME Antares 110 | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 31st percentile (109 hp)B · 28th percentile (105 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 45th percentile (366 ci)B · 36th percentile (331 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 81st percentile (24)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 33rd percentile (10,251 lb)B · 22nd percentile (8,333 lb)
A · Antares 110B · Tiger Six 105Median Row Crop Tractor