Image not recorded
SAMEModel A
SAME Explorer 80C
Utility
- power
- 80 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
SAME Explorer 80C vs SAME Leopard 85
Image not recorded
SAMEModel B
SAME Leopard 85
Utility
- power
- 82 hp
- displacement
- 253 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
SAMESAME Explorer 80C
vs
SAMESAME Leopard 85
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Leopard 85 higher · +2 hp (+3%)Explorer 80C80 hp
Leopard 8582 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Explorer 80C is in the 71st percentile; Leopard 85 is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Leopard 85 higher · +9 ci (+4%)Explorer 80C244 ci
Leopard 85253 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Explorer 80C is in the 68th percentile; Leopard 85 is in the 71st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedExplorer 80C4
Leopard 854
Median Utility Tractor4
Explorer 80C is in the 50th percentile; Leopard 85 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Leopard 85 higher · +4 (+50%)Explorer 80C8
Leopard 8512
Median Utility Tractor12
Explorer 80C is in the 23rd percentile; Leopard 85 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Explorer 80C (A)Leopard 85 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | SAME Explorer 80C | SAME Leopard 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME | SAME | Same |
| Model | Explorer 80C | Leopard 85 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | SAME Explorer 80C | SAME Leopard 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME | SAME | Same |
| Model | 1000.4A | 1054P | — |
| Power Output | 80hp | 82hp | ▲ Leopard 85+2 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,270RPM | ▲ Explorer 80C+230 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 253ci | ▲ Leopard 85+9 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ Leopard 85+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | SAME Explorer 80C | SAME Leopard 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | SAME Explorer 80C | SAME Leopard 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 132in | 159in | ▲ Leopard 85+27 in · +20% |
| Width | 67.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 51.5in | 108in | ▲ Leopard 85+56.5 in · +110% |
| Operating Weight | 9,259lb | 7,607lb | ▲ Explorer 80C+1,652 lb · +22% |
Tread Width
| Spec | SAME Explorer 80C | SAME Leopard 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tread | 15.7in | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | SAME Explorer 80C | SAME Leopard 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | SAME Explorer 80C | SAME Leopard 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | SAME Explorer 80C | SAME Leopard 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 71st percentile (80 hp)B · 73rd percentile (82 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 71st percentile (253 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 83rd percentile (9,259 lb)B · 72nd percentile (7,607 lb)
A · Explorer 80CB · Leopard 85Median Utility Tractor