Image not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Steyr 658 vs Steyr M 952
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr M 952
Sub-Compact
- power
- 52 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
SteyrSteyr 658
vs
SteyrSteyr M 952
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 658 higher · +3 hp (+6%)65855 hp
M 95252 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
658 is in the 94th percentile; M 952 is in the 91st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 658 higher · +27 ci (+16%)658192 ci
M 952165 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
658 is in the 96th percentile; M 952 is in the 88th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 658 higher · +1 (+33%)6584
M 9523
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
658 is in the 90th percentile; M 952 is in the 50th · 802 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied65816
M 95216
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
658 is in the 89th percentile; M 952 is in the 89th · 616 models
658 (A)M 952 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Steyr 658 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Steyr | Steyr | Same |
| Model | 658 | M 952 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Steyr 658 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Steyr | Perkins | — |
| Model | WD 408.42 | 903.27T | — |
| Power Output | 55hp | 52hp | ▲ 658+3 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ M 952+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 658+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 192ci | 165ci | ▲ 658+27 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.7in | ▲ 658+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 5in | ▲ M 952+1.1 in · +28% |
Transmission
| Spec | Steyr 658 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | synchro | Synchro | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Steyr 658 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 140in | 141in | ▲ M 952+1 in · <1% |
| Height | 84.6in | 93.7in | ▲ M 952+9.1 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 5,854lb | 5,954lb | ▲ M 952+100 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Steyr 658 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Steyr 658 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 7.50-18 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9R28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Steyr 658 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Steyr 658 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 94th percentile (55 hp)B · 91st percentile (52 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 96th percentile (192 ci)B · 88th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 90th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 89th percentile (16)B · 89th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 96th percentile (5,854 lb)B · 97th percentile (5,954 lb)
A · 658B · M 952Median Sub-Compact Tractor