Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
TYM T290 vs TYM T353
Image not recorded
TYMTYM T290
vs
TYMTYM T353
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T353 higher · +4 hp (+13%)T29031 hp
T35335 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T290 is in the 23rd percentile; T353 is in the 28th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T353 higher · +15.5 ci (+17%)T29091.5 ci
T353107 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T290 is in the 20th percentile; T353 is in the 25th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ T353 higher · +1 (+33%)T2903
T3534
Median Utility Tractor4
T290 is in the 23rd percentile; T353 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedT29012
T35312
Median Utility Tractor12
T290 is in the 50th percentile; T353 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
T290 (A)T353 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | TYM T290 | TYM T353 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | TYM | TYM | Same |
| Model | T290 | T353 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | TYM T290 | TYM T353 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | D1503 | S4L2 | — |
| Power Output | 31hp | 35hp | ▲ T353+4 hp · +13% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ T290+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ T353+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 91.5ci | 107ci | ▲ T353+15.5 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | TYM T290 | TYM T353 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | TYM T290 | TYM T353 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | 126in | ▲ T290+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 52in | 53.5in | ▲ T353+1.5 in · +3% |
| Height | 92in | 94.5in | ▲ T353+2.5 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 3,064lb | 3,065lb | ▲ T353+1 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | TYM T290 | TYM T353 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | TYM T290 | TYM T353 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | TYM T290 | TYM T353 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | TYM T290 | TYM T353 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | TYM T290 | TYM T353 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | TYM T290 | TYM T353 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 23rd percentile (31 hp)B · 28th percentile (35 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 20th percentile (91.5 ci)B · 25th percentile (107 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 24th percentile (3,064 lb)B · 24th percentile (3,065 lb)
A · T290B · T353Median Utility Tractor