
ValmetModel A
Valmet 6550
Row Crop
- power
- 98.6 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 36
Head to head · Row Crop

Row Crop

Row Crop
How they compare
6550 is in the 23rd percentile; 6200 is in the 20th · 1,206 models
6550 is in the 21st percentile; 6200 is in the 21st · 1,409 models
6550 is in the 17th percentile; 6200 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
6550 is in the 95th percentile; 6200 is in the 27th · 1,200 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Valmet 6550 | Valtra 6200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Valmet | Valtra | — |
| Model | 6550 | 6200 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
| Spec | Valmet 6550 | Valtra 6200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Valmet | SisuDiesel | — |
| Model | 420 DWRE | 44DT | — |
| Power Output | 98.6hp | 92.5hp | ▲ 6550+6.1 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 268ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.7in | Same |
| Spec | Valmet 6550 | Valtra 6200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Three-speed power shift | Sync shuttle | — |
| Spec | Valmet 6550 | Valtra 6200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 176in | 178in | ▲ 6200+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 85.8in | 88.2in | ▲ 6200+2.4 in · +3% |
| Height | 109in | 105in | ▲ 6550+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 9,700lb | 9,480lb | ▲ 6550+220 lb · +2% |
| Spec | Valmet 6550 | Valtra 6200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Spec | Valmet 6550 | Valtra 6200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Valmet 6550 | Valtra 6200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Spec | Valmet 6550 | Valtra 6200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
| Spec | Valmet 6550 | Valtra 6200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context