Image not recorded
YanmarModel A
Yanmar Ke-200H
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 61.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Yanmar Ke-200H vs Yanmar YM2001
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM2001
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 83 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 15
YanmarYanmar Ke-200H
vs
YanmarYanmar YM2001
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedKe-200H20 hp
YM200120 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Ke-200H is in the 8th percentile; YM2001 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ YM2001 higher · +21.6 ci (+35%)Ke-200H61.4 ci
YM200183 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Ke-200H is in the 7th percentile; YM2001 is in the 14th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedKe-200H3
YM20013
Median Utility Tractor4
Ke-200H is in the 23rd percentile; YM2001 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ YM2001 higher · +247 lb (+15%)Ke-200H1,649 lb
YM20011,896 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Ke-200H is in the 8th percentile; YM2001 is in the 10th · 5,107 models
Ke-200H (A)YM2001 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Yanmar Ke-200H | Yanmar YM2001 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Yanmar | Same |
| Model | Ke-200H | YM2001 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Yanmar Ke-200H | Yanmar YM2001 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Yanmar | Same |
| Model | 3TNE74 | 3T82B | — |
| Power Output | 20hp | 20hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,550RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ Ke-200H+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 61.4ci | 83ci | ▲ YM2001+21.6 ci · +35% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.2in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Yanmar Ke-200H | Yanmar YM2001 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Yanmar Ke-200H | Yanmar YM2001 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 107in | 113in | ▲ YM2001+6 in · +6% |
| Width | 47.1in | 48.4in | ▲ YM2001+1.3 in · +3% |
| Height | 86.3in | 72.8in | ▲ Ke-200H+13.5 in · +19% |
| Operating Weight | 1,649lb | 1,896lb | ▲ YM2001+247 lb · +15% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Yanmar Ke-200H | Yanmar YM2001 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3-Point Hitch SAE Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 1 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Yanmar Ke-200H | Yanmar YM2001 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Yanmar Ke-200H | Yanmar YM2001 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter (12 volts) | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 8th percentile (20 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 7th percentile (61.4 ci)B · 14th percentile (83 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 8th percentile (1,649 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,896 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 14th percentile (107 in)B · 18th percentile (113 in)
A · Ke-200HB · YM2001Median Utility Tractor