Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely 6A
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 404 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely 6A vs Challenger MT665
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT665
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely 6A
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT665
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT665 higher · +109 ci (+27%)6A404 ci
MT665513 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
6A is in the 90th percentile; MT665 is in the 94th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied6A6
MT6656
Median Utility Tractor4
6A is in the 93rd percentile; MT665 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT665 higher · +12 (+200%)6A6
MT66518
Median Utility Tractor12
6A is in the 11th percentile; MT665 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT665 higher · +15,130 lb (+238%)6A6,370 lb
MT66521,500 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
6A is in the 60th percentile; MT665 is in the 95th · 5,107 models
6A (A)MT665 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | 6A | MT665 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Sisu | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,365RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT665+835 RPM · +61% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 404ci | 513ci | ▲ MT665+109 ci · +27% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ MT665+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 5.7in | ▲ MT665+0.9 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | 18-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 203in | ▲ MT665+40 in · +25% |
| Width | 70in | 98.2in | ▲ MT665+28.2 in · +40% |
| Height | 74in | 121in | ▲ MT665+47 in · +64% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 121in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,370lb | 21,500lb | ▲ MT665+15,130 lb · +238% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 9.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (404 ci)B · 94th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 60th percentile (6,370 lb)B · 95th percentile (21,500 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 81st percentile (163 in)B · 94th percentile (203 in)
A · 6AB · MT665Median Utility Tractor