Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely 6A
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 404 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely 6A vs Claas Challenger 55
ClaasModel B
Claas Challenger 55
Crawler
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 442 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely 6A
vs
ClaasClaas Challenger 55
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger 55 higher · +38 ci (+9%)6A404 ci
Challenger 55442 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
6A is in the 90th percentile; Challenger 55 is in the 92nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied6A6
Challenger 556
Median Utility Tractor4
6A is in the 93rd percentile; Challenger 55 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Challenger 55 higher · +10 (+167%)6A6
Challenger 5516
Median Utility Tractor12
6A is in the 11th percentile; Challenger 55 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ Challenger 55 higher · +19,630 lb (+308%)6A6,370 lb
Challenger 5526,000 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
6A is in the 60th percentile; Challenger 55 is in the 96th · 5,107 models
6A (A)Challenger 55 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Claas Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Claas | — |
| Model | 6A | Challenger 55 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Claas Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3126 | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,365RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Challenger 55+735 RPM · +54% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 404ci | 442ci | ▲ Challenger 55+38 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 5in | ▲ Challenger 55+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Claas Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Claas Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 211in | ▲ Challenger 55+48 in · +29% |
| Width | 70in | 91in | ▲ Challenger 55+21 in · +30% |
| Height | 74in | 125in | ▲ Challenger 55+51 in · +69% |
| Operating Weight | 6,370lb | 26,000lb | ▲ Challenger 55+19,630 lb · +308% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Claas Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Variable-displacement Load-sensing Pressure-compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Differential Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Claas Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Claas Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Differential Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Claas Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Claas Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 9.5gal | 8.6gal | ▲ 6A+0.9 gal · +10% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Claas Challenger 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (404 ci)B · 92nd percentile (442 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 60th percentile (6,370 lb)B · 96th percentile (26,000 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 81st percentile (163 in)B · 95th percentile (211 in)
A · 6AB · Challenger 55Median Utility Tractor