Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely 6A
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 404 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely 6A vs Oliver 1865
Image not recorded
OliverModel B
Oliver 1865
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 426 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely 6A
vs
OliverOliver 1865
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 1865 higher · +22 ci (+5%)6A404 ci
1865426 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
6A is in the 90th percentile; 1865 is in the 92nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied6A6
18656
Median Utility Tractor4
6A is in the 93rd percentile; 1865 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1865 higher · +4 (+67%)6A6
186510
Median Utility Tractor12
6A is in the 11th percentile; 1865 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1865 higher · +3,930 lb (+62%)6A6,370 lb
186510,300 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
6A is in the 60th percentile; 1865 is in the 86th · 5,107 models
6A (A)1865 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Oliver 1865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Oliver | — |
| Model | 6A | 1865 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Oliver 1865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,365RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ 1865+435 RPM · +32% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 404ci | 426ci | ▲ 1865+22 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 5in | ▲ 1865+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Oliver 1865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Oliver 1865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 70in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 74in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,370lb | 10,300lb | ▲ 1865+3,930 lb · +62% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Oliver 1865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Oliver 1865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Oliver 1865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Oliver 1865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Oliver 1865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 9.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (404 ci)B · 92nd percentile (426 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 60th percentile (6,370 lb)B · 86th percentile (10,300 lb)
A · 6AB · 1865Median Utility Tractor